- Soil properties and other environmental factors are responsible for iron deficiency in soybeans.
- Iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) is a complex issue for soybean farmers, especially in calcareous soils (soils with excessive lime).
- Selecting varieties more tolerant to IDC is the best available management practice, although other management practices can help lessen severity.
Iron (Fe) is an essential nutrient and an important component of nodulation, nitrogen fixation and enzymes that form chlorophyll. A lack of iron within soybean plants is often referred to as iron deficiency chlorosis (IDC) and is easily recognized due to reduced leaf chlorophyll, chlorosis and subsequent yellowing of leaves. IDC symptoms begin to appear within a few weeks after soybeans emerge, with interveinal chlorosis showing on the first trifoliate. Iron does not readily translocate within the plant, causing new growth to be impacted first when deficiencies continue. Unlike visible symptoms of other deficiencies, soybean leaf veins remain green with IDC as the remainder of the leaves begin to yellow. Under severe IDC, edges of leaves will become necrotic and start to die (Figure 1).
IDC symptoms tend to appear in irregular shaped areas across fields, causing significant reduction in yield potential of affected areas. Substantial yield reductions have been reported across many areas where soybeans are grown but are more prevalent in western Minnesota, northwestern Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota, where calcareous or sodic (alkali) soils are most common.
Common Causes for IDC
Although the name IDC implies it is caused by low soil iron levels, it is the result of soil conditions that decrease iron uptake by soybean roots. Most soils likely have sufficient iron concentrations; however, not all of it is readily available to plants. Soybean IDC is mostly observed in areas with high calcium carbonate and/or high salinity soil levels.
Calcareous soils developed from calcium carbonate parent material commonly have pH levels that range from 7.0-8.5, making them highly conducive to IDC symptoms. Within fields predominately having calcareous soils, IDC symptoms will often appear first in wetter areas where parent calcium carbonate more readily dissolves into a solution that releases carbonate (C03-2). This acts as a strong base that increases soil pH. If soil nitrate levels are also high, soybeans will preferentially uptake soil nitrogen and subsequentially release additional carbonates that further increase pH within the soil root rhizosphere (root zone) and exacerbate IDC symptoms. Although IDC symptoms are commonly observed in high pH soils, this can be a poor predictor. Symptoms are not always seen in elevated soil pH areas with lower carbonate and salinity levels.
Soils with high pH levels oxidize iron into a ferric state (Fe3+), which binds iron tightly to soil components, making it less soluble and able to move to nearby roots. Soybeans depend on iron being in a ferrous state (Fe2+) for uptake and transport into the plant. Acidification from plant roots helps reduce iron from the Fe3+ to Fe2+ form, making it more available for plant uptake. IDC symptoms in high pH soils can be worsened by other nutrient deficiencies as well as cool growing conditions that slow growth and development. If Fe deficiency is not severe, and environmental conditions improve, resumed root growth will normally allow plants to absorb sufficient Fe and recover.
Management Practices
Variety Selection
- Golden Harvest has significant research efforts to characterize varieties for IDC tolerance (Figures 2 and 3). Soybean variety tolerance is the most important strategy in managing this complex issue. Varieties characterized as having high tolerance to IDC are generally more “iron efficient” or better able to reduce Fe3+ to the Fe2+ form in soil around roots, making it more available for plant uptake.1
- Although some IDC symptoms may be visible on tolerant and susceptible varieties in severe situations, tolerant varieties will have less symptomology and yield loss. Susceptible varieties can sometimes provide a better option in fields not prone to IDC, making it important to map areas that have shown IDC symptoms and use this insight for making future variety selection decisions.
Apply Iron Chelates to Soil
- Iron chelates are often added as a soil amendment to increase the solubility of iron in the soil and deliver it to the plant to minimize IDC symptoms. Chelated forms of Fe have shown to help correct IDC and protect yield potential with varying levels of effectiveness in different soil pH.2 Fe-EDDHA fertilizer is considered to be the most stable of the chelates and has shown to increase grain yield of soybeans on calcareous soils.1 Research has also shown that the most effective chelate application timing and placement for reducing IDC is Fe-EDDHA chelate fertilizer in-furrow at planting, even though no iron chelate treatment completely eliminates chlorosis.1 The success of chelate application relies heavily on the buffering capacity (ability to maintain stable pH) and pH of the soil.3 Return on investment (ROI) of applying an iron chelate should always be considered before using on a large scale.
- Foliar Fe applications have shown to “regreen” chlorotic symptoms in some studies but were less effective in severe IDC field conditions. While leaves appeared less chlorotic, previous research showed that foliar Fe may not reach the plant roots and, therefore, yield potential may decrease later in the season.3 Again, ROI should be evaluated for foliar Fe products before using broadly.
Manage Areas With High Soil Nitrate Levels
- Excess soil nitrates in IDC-susceptible soils have been shown to increase the severity.2 Soybeans commonly use symbiotic relationships with rhizobia to form nitrogen-fixing nodules on roots, but when soil nitrates are available in soil, they will take up nitrogen directly from the soil. When taking up nitrogen directly from the soil, soybean roots release bicarbonates, which further increases soil pH and reduces Fe uptake. This can be highly visible in fields with tire track compaction (Figure 4). Previous research showed that soil nitrates were lower in compacted tracks than in adjacent uncompacted soil.2 It is believed that the compaction decreases soil porosity, thus increasing soil saturation, which increases soil denitrification. Denitrification within compacted areas helped minimize IDC in those areas. Using oat companion crops interseeded within soybeans has also been found to help manage high nitrate soils since these crops scavenge soil nitrogen and excess soil moisture, thus decreasing bicarbonates that increase pH in the soybean root rhizosphere.3
Adjust Seeding Rate and Row Spacing
- Increasing soybean seeding rate has shown to minimize IDC symptoms in some cases. Increased seeding rates result in more plants, which develop additional roots. Because soybeans acidify the rhizosphere, the increased root mass helps to further acidify the root zone, reducing more iron from the Fe3+ to Fe2+ form, which is a more plant-available form. Research shows that increased seeding rate can reduce chlorosis, although yield responses also depend on other environmental conditions.4,5
- Narrow row spacings (<30-inch) generally increase seed-to-seed spacing, producing a similar outcome to reducing seeding rates. Due to this, much larger seeding rate increases may be needed to help minimize IDC symptoms when planting narrow-row soybeans.
Minimize Additional Plant Stress
- Any additional stress will only exasperate IDC symptoms. Help minimize additional plant stress with specific management practices as needed to avoid the following:
- Nutrient deficiencies
- Diseases
- Nematodes
- Herbicide injury
- Severe compaction, which damages soybean roots
Summary
IDC is a complex field issue that requires a robust management strategy. Since it generally occurs due to various stresses and not simply due to low soil Fe, it is challenging to mitigate. In areas where IDC is a concern, selecting a soybean variety with tolerance to IDC is one of the best methods to protect yield potential.
- References:
- 1 Gamble, A.; J. Howe; D. Delaney; E. van Santen; and R. Yates. 2014. Iron chelates alleviate iron chlorosis in soybean on high pH soils. Agronomy Journal, 106(4), 1251-1257.
- 2 Kaiser, D.; J. Lamb; P. Bloom; and J. Hernandez. 2014. Comparison of field management strategies for preventing iron deficiency chlorosis in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 106(6), 1963-1974.
- 3 Merry, R.; A. Dobbels; W. Sadok; S. Naeve; R. Stupar; and A. Lorenz. 2022. Iron deficiency in soybean. Crop Science, 62(1), 36-52.
- 4 Goos, R., and B. Johnson. 2001. Seed treatment, seeding rate, and cultivar effects on iron deficiency chlorosis of soybean. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24, 1255-1268.
- 5 Naeve, S. 2006. Iron deficiency in soybean: Soybean seeding rate and companion crop effects. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1575-1581.
Product performance assumes disease presence.
© 2023 Syngenta. Important: Always read and follow label instructions. Some products may not be registered for sale or use in all states or counties. Please check with your local extension service to ensure registration status. AAtrex 4L, AAtrex Nine-O, Acuron, Agri-Flex, Agri-Mek 0.15 EC, Agri-Mek SC, Avicta 500FS, Avicta Complete Beans 500, Avicta Complete Corn 250, Avicta Duo Corn, Avicta Duo 250 Corn, Avicta Duo COT202, Avicta Duo Cotton, Besiege, Bicep II Magnum, Bicep II Magnum FC, Bicep Lite II Magnum, Callisto Xtra, Denim, Endigo ZC, Endigo ZCX, Epi-Mek 0.15EC, Expert, Force, Force 3G, Force CS, Force 6.5G, Force Evo, Gramoxone SL 2.0, Gramoxone SL 3.0, Karate, Karate with Zeon Technology, Lamcap, Lamcap II, Lamdec, Lexar EZ, Lumax EZ, Medal II ATZ, Minecto Pro, Proclaim, Tavium Plus VaporGrip Technology, Voliam Xpress and Warrior II with Zeon Technology are Restricted Use Pesticides.
Some seed treatment offers are separately registered products applied to the seed as a combined slurry. Always read individual product labels and treater instructions before combining and applying component products. Orondis Gold may be sold as a formulated premix or as a combination of separately registered products: Orondis Gold 200 and Orondis Gold B.
Important: Always read and follow label and bag tag instructions; only those labeled as tolerant to glufosinate may be sprayed with glufosinate ammonium-based herbicides. LibertyLink®, Liberty® and the Water Droplet logo are registered trademarks of BASF. HERCULEX® and the HERCULEX Shield are trademarks of Corteva Agriscience LLC. HERCULEX Insect Protection technology by Corteva Agriscience LLC. Under federal and local laws, only dicamba-containing herbicides registered for use on dicamba-tolerant varieties may be applied. See product labels for details and tank mix partners. Golden Harvest® and NK® soybean varieties are protected under granted or pending U.S. variety patents and other intellectual property rights, regardless of the trait(s) within the seed. The Enlist E3® soybean, LibertyLink®, LibertyLink® GT27®, Roundup Ready 2 Xtend®, Roundup Ready 2 Yield® and XtendFlex® soybean traits may be protected under numerous United States patents. It is unlawful to save soybeans containing these traits for planting or transfer to others for use as a planting seed. Only dicamba formulations that employ VaporGrip® Technology are approved for use with Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® and XtendFlex® soybeans. Only 2,4-D choline formulations with Colex-D® Technology are approved for use with Enlist E3® soybeans. ENLIST E3® soybean technology is jointly developed with Corteva Agriscience LLC and M.S. Technologies, L.L.C. The ENLIST trait and ENLIST Weed Control System are technologies owned and developed by Corteva Agriscience LLC. ENLIST® and ENLIST E3® are trademarks of Corteva Agriscience LLC. GT27® is a trademark of M.S. Technologies, L.L.C. and BASF. Roundup Ready 2 Xtend® , Roundup Ready 2 Yield®, XtendFlex®, VaporGrip® and YieldGard VT Pro® are registered trademarks used under license from the Bayer Group.
Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.